The War is Now Out in the Open

I want to address the significance of the assassination of Charlie Kirk R.I.P.

Between when I write this and when you read it, there might be developments and new information, but it won't impact my publication, because I want to talk about the core of the issue.

At its most basic form, in the United States of America, there is a war of ideologies happening, because society has drifted from the constitution and Bill of Rights.

The United States of America is the ONLY formal incorporation of human beings in history, assembled around the idea that the government's primary role is to protect the God-given rights of the governed.

At the writing of the constitution, that idea was not taken for granted by the pilgrims and the first Americans, who cherished their victory over the monarch armies of the old continent (Europe) and their unprecedented victory over rulers.

When the Founding Fathers crafted the constitution, the first amendment these illuminated souls chose to ink was:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

This is not the norm! It's the outlier that is the gem.

Planet Earth is host to 8.2bn people, but only 340 million were born in or immigrated to a country, whose constitution begins with this amendment.

This means only 4.1% of human beings are under a government, whose official mission is to protect one's free speech.

How did the Founding Fathers believe free human beings, living in the country they fought for, should protect their first amendment, particularly from the temptation of other human beings to rule over others? Well, they drafted this perfect passage, called the 2^nd amendment:

A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The Founding Fathers acknowledge that humans are perfect beings, created by God, but that they are not fully-developed, so to use their free choice to do only good, so they must assimilate in a manner that hedges the issues that arise from this lack of completion of evolution in the use of free choice.

This assumption is at the very heart of issues that divide progressives, the fastest-growing religion in the industrialized world, from the non-progressives.

The only way to solve this is with the ultimate weapon that the non-progressives possess over progressives: MERIT.

Progressives tell you how Eutopia ought to be and architect a plan to achieve it, without accounting for the cost, because the progressives do not factor the trade-off.

It is suicidal, yet it can flourish in a wealthy society that can absorb the losses.

In fact, if the society is rich enough, it can almost be viewed as virtuous, in comparison to the non-progressive, who is portrayed as antiquated for explaining that the progressive plans are not feasible or realistic.

Progressives wanted climate Eutopia, so they banned coal. Therefore, they put the United States at a precarious national security disaster against the CCP, by which the country must now triple its energy capacity or it might lose A.I. supremacy.

Progressives wanted to allow all people into the United States, but other countries sent their worst.

Progressives look at the world at the EXACT OPPOSITE of the Founding Fathers, which is why this is so divisive.

The ONLY real tool to solve it is with accountability and merit.

If a judge thinks that it is a good idea to not have tariffs, he needs to have consequences for his decision. Only merit and accountability can end this.

When it is one side that believes the world can be Eutopia, if we just got rid of some people, who are holding us back, then assassinations like these would happen more and more.

R.I.P Charlie Kirk, a person that wanted to debate. Just sad and so Un-American to take his life because of that.

I add the poem "The Snake," which was often read by Donald Trump during his rallies:
On her way to work one morning
Down the path alongside the lake
A tender-hearted woman saw a poor half-frozen snake
His pretty colored skin had been all frosted with the dew
"Oh well," she cried, "I'll take you in and I'll take care of you"
"Take me in, oh tender woman (come on in)
Take me in, for heaven's sake (come on in)
Take me in tender woman," sighed the snake

"I saved you," cried that woman
"And you've bit me even, why?
And you know your bite is poisonous and now I'm gonna die"
"Oh shut up, silly woman," said that reptile with a grin
"You knew damn well I was a snake before you brought me in"
"Please take me in, oh tender woman (come on in)
Take me in, for heaven's sake (come on in)
Take me in tender woman," sighed the snake
Sighed the snake
"Take me in, tender woman" (come on in)
Sighed the snake, sighed the snake
"Take me in, tender woman"
Sighed the snake